Legal AI assistant

Focused legal questions, with review kept visible

Ask practical legal questions in AI Chat or question completed, indexed documents within a dedicated matter workspace.

LexLINQ separates general practical questions from matter-specific document questions. Answers are starting points for professional review, not legal advice or final legal conclusions.

Choose the right question space

Use AI Chat for a practical legal question that needs a concise starting point. Use Matter AI Chat when the question relates to completed, indexed documents in the current matter workspace. Keeping these contexts separate helps the reviewer understand what information informed the response.

  • State the jurisdiction, time period, and factual assumptions where relevant.
  • Ask one focused question at a time.
  • Treat the response as a route to further checking, not a final conclusion.

Review the answer against the source

Check any material fact, date, quotation, legal proposition, and document reference against the original material. If the available material is incomplete or conflicting, record the uncertainty and identify the next source or question required.

Use clear approval boundaries

A response should not be sent to a client, counterparty, court, or regulator without the level of professional review appropriate to the task. The supervising professional remains responsible for deciding whether the answer is suitable for use.

FAQ

Common questions

How is this different from a generic chatbot?

LexLINQ provides focused legal workflow modules, including a matter-scoped chat that works from indexed documents in the current workspace.

Can an answer be relied on without checking it?

No. AI-assisted answers may be incomplete or inaccurate and must be independently reviewed and verified.